98itnews.gif

Standing Room Only to Hear Truckers from Around the Globe
OTA hosts first gathering of world’s major trucking nations

(Toronto, Nov. 28, 2005) - The recent Ontario Trucking Association’s annual convention kicked off with a bang as the association hosted “the first-ever gathering of the world’s major trucking nations,” according to OTA president and CEO of the Canadian Trucking Alliance, David Bradley. On Nov. 17 a two part International Trucking Forum whose panelists featured the CEO and a carrier representative of the American Trucking Associations; the Australian Trucking Association; the International Road Union (Europe); and the Road Transport Forum New Zealand, drew such a crowd that it was standing room only.

Convention delegates, including some international attendees from as far away as the Netherlands and South Africa, were eager to hear about trucking industry challenges around the globe and compare them with their own.

They were also eager to learn how Canada and the US are coping with problems closer to home, such as border crossing wait times, hours of service and cabotage.

The session was moderated by the Canadian trio of Scott Smith (JD Smith & Sons) who is chairman of the Ontario Trucking Association; Canadian Trucking Alliance chairman John Cyopeck (Canpar Transport LP) and David Bradley.

What delegates learned was that trucking companies around the globe face many of the very same problems, with minor variations dependent on geography, politics and climate.

Fuel prices and the carrier’s ability to negotiate fuel surcharges were universally acclaimed as the most common problems plaguing trucking companies worldwide.

“Fuel is a big issue for us,” said Denis Robertson, Managing Director of Roadmaster Haulage of Sydney, Australia. One of Australia’s, largest meat carriers, Robertson’s company is constantly working to make shippers aware of the rising cost of fuel.

“If they don’t pay, we don’t carry for them,” said Robertson. “What shippers have to understand is that it’s in their best interest for us to increase rates to cover our costs -- because if we don’t they’ll end up having to deal with a monopoly.”
Robertson said fuel surcharges, or levies, as he called them, are his company’s way of covering increasing fuel cost. “And more and more Australian companies are doing it,” he said. “Fuel costs are something a carrier has to follow day-to-day and adjust surcharges accordingly monthly.”

Other fuel savings techniques used by Roadmaster Haulage include strict route controls, the use of technology to keep efficiency at its peak.

Speed limiters are another method of increasing fuel efficiency, pointed out panelists from the European Union, where speed limitation is already enforced on heavy trucks. (The OTA proposed just such a measure be adopted by the Ontario government at a press conference Nov. 16). But fuel surcharges are also key to keeping trucks on the road, they added.

“Our fuel prices increased by 25 per cent this year,” said Wim Voss, General Director of Voss Logistics, headquartered in Oss, Netherlands. “So we’ve had to negotiate quite a bit with shippers to have diesel surcharges added on to our prices. They eventually accepted them because they’re sick of us asking,” he joked, to general laughter.

“The problem is that companies also go to tender for hauling rates, so when everyone bids, prices are bound to go down and the surcharge disappears. That said, the list of bankruptcies of carriers in the EU has increased since the first half of this year, and now because of the increased capacity of goods, the carriers are on the right side of the bargaining table. We now follow a more opportunistic policy when it comes to pricing. Today we get our price.”

In New Zealand, carriers have to absorb a road user charge as well as the fuel price increase, said, Warren Hamilton, owner of Cromwell transport Ltd. in Otago, N.Z.

“Our fuel costs have increased 40 per cent over the past 12 years and we have to pay a road user charge of 35 cents per km for a maximum of 44 tonnes.” He said. “So our operating costs are substantial. But now people are starting to realize that in order to cover these costs we have to pass them on through rate increases and fuel surcharges.” As for mandatory speed limiters, Hamilton said companies in New Zealand are considering asking the government to make them mandatory on all truck engines. In the meantime, fuel efficiency initiatives include “driver education, maintenance and technology,” said Hamilton.

US carriers are trying to convey the fact that the fuel price increase is just as much a shipper’s problem as it is a carrier’s, chimed in Steve Williams, Chairman and CEO of Maverick Transportation Inc. out of Little Rock, Ark. And immediate past chairman of the American Trucking Associations.

“In a way, the record high fuel prices are a blessing because shippers can’t deny that it’s an issue,” said Williams. “Now they’re asking questions about how their transportation budgets are being destroyed, because the people on top are starting to realize there’s a crisis due to fuel prices and the driver shortage. Thanks to the fuel crisis trucking is very visible right now and it’s up to us to take the opportunity to better manage our fuel costs, by passing them on to our customers.”

But fuel surcharges aren’t the one and only way to better manage fuel costs, the international panel of carriers agreed.

“We also have to spec our equipment for better fuel efficiency, and manage our drivers better, teach them how to drive for better efficiency,” Williams added, pointing to wide base tires, auxiliary power units and driving simulators for drivers as other ways his company reduces fuel costs.

Financial incentives for drivers with better mileage are among the driver management techniques being used,” said Williams. Eliminating idling time is another, and so is reducing wait times prior to lading and unloading. Mandatory activation of speed limiters is also something that Williams said he could support if it applied to everyone.

“Loading and unloading time is very well managed in the EU,” said Wim Voss. “Now in the EU, just in time delivery is much more common than before.”

Another problem shared by some, but not all the countries from which panelists hailed, was the driver shortage.

Countries the most affected by the shortage, according to the panel, included Canada and the US, while Europe, Australia and New Zealand were less affected.

“Obviously driver retention is critical to our well-being, but when I compare our needs to those of North America I think we’re not doing too badly,” said Denis Robertson. “Still the average age of a driver in Australia is 50, so we do have an aging population, which is a concern.”

Paying drivers well is one way Robertson’s company keeps them, he said.

“And other companies are addressing the problem with fuel mileage incentive programs, and bonuses for running with them for a certain amount of time. “

A foremost concern for his company’s drivers is lifestyle, said Robertson.

“Endeavoring to make our company a better place to work is how we keep drivers,” he said. “We give them a career path and we give them a comfortable environment to work in. We have drivers joining at 50 who are still long distance hauling into their 70s because our trucks are so comfortable. “

The problem, for everyone on the panel it seemed, was getting new drivers in to replace the ones getting older.

In the Netherlands, the shortage of well-trained drivers is reaching a crisis point, said Wim Voss.

“With Poland joining the EU, there are lots of people willing to work, but they’re not necessarily well-trained,” said Voss. “That’s why we have our own education centre. They spend three weeks on the road training with a driver then two weeks in the classroom, and then another three weeks of practical training with a supervisor, for a total of eight weeks of training with the company. At the end of that they should be ready to deal with international traffic.”

Voss said the investment in driver education makes for higher retention rates.

“It creates a team of drivers we can relay on for decades,” he said.

And a standard of excellence for truck driving is soon to be adopted across the EU. Voss added.

“Next year there’ll be a certificate of competence for EU drivers, and the cost will have to be covered by the companies who hire them. As far as my company goes, we support it. We support anything that’s good for the industry.”

In some countries, driver education is even backed by government financial incentives, said Robertson.

“In Australia we used to get incentives for educating our drivers, ad we realized how beneficial it was,” Robertson said. “Now most companies in Australia have recognized the benefits as well. And continue to train their drivers, even if there are no longer financial incentives available.”

Chris Althaus, CEO of the Australian Trucking Association, said that in the 70s a major source of drivers had been the military, particularly Viet Nam vets. Today, he said the industry must look to non-traditional sources. “Companies are investing in trucks with automatic transmissions to try to attract more women to the job.”

Bill Graves, CEO of the American Trucking Associations said that the military has served as an important source of drivers in the US, but lamented the fact that while the industry has “reached out to the Department of Defence for ex-military personnel, trucking is not listed as a place of potential employment because (truck driving) is not seen as a desirable occupation. It’s a tough sell.”

Tony Friedlander, CEO of the Road Transport Forum of New Zealand, said his industry “has lost a few drivers to Australia” and had a tongue-in-cheek warning to Canadian carriers who might try to recruit Kiwi drivers. “We will have some carriers meet you at the airport and shake you warmly by the neck if you try and steal our drivers.”

In short, the health and safety of roads, loads, the transportation industry and international and local trade as a whole had always rested squarely in the hands of trucking companies themselves, even though, over the long term, it really shouldn’t, panelists agreed.

“As far as shippers go, they really couldn’t care less what we do to carry the loads, they just want them moved from Point A to Point B,” said Umberto de Pretto, Deputy Secretary General of the International Road Transport Union headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland.

“So we’ve always taken responsibility for everything, from the size of the vehicles we use to carry loads, to how much we’re allowed to carry on the roads available to us. What we have to do is let the shippers do some of the fighting when it comes to making truck transportation work better.”

© 1995 - 2008, Ontario Trucking Association
555 Dixon Road, Toronto, Ontario
M9W 1H8
Tel: (416) 249-7401 | Fax: (416) 245-6152
Email: info@ontruck.org